3 Comments

  1. Yeah, I’m reading it now and man, is it an ordeal. I’m finding myself just skimming through it at this point, wanting to get it down as quickly as possible; there’s so much melodramatic pose that I can’t understand what the hell is going on half the time. I’ve read books and stories from the 17-century that are easier to grasp. This book is from goddamn 1991! You’d think the authors would know about 20-century English!

    Reading this book just made me wish I were watching ‘Godzilla Vs. The Smog Monster’; it’s more entertaining and I’m able to take it just as seriously.

    1. To be fair, there are a few entertaining moments in it. You’d think that my review was an unmitigated pan, but one of the authors (on a previous version of their web sites –now offline) had managed to carefully excerpt snippets of it to make it look as if I had given it a thumbs-up. It was an admirable lesson in selective editing from a pro writer, and I’m sorry to see that it’s now gone from the Internet.

    2. This is among my scariest five books I’ve ever read. The first time I experienced it I couldn’t sleep for a week. Climate change doesn’t hold a candle to a toxic waste monster that destroys the world in a week. The scariest thing is that the basic premise is true: people dump poison everywhere — it could bite off your ass a hell of a lot worse than a glacier that might melt a bit over thirty years. Excellent horror, almost too well-to-do eat your heart out, Greta.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *