Month: December 2018

The Lucky One (2012)

The Lucky One (2012)

(On Cable TV, December 2018) Here are the facts: The Lucky One is a romantic drama based on a Nicholas Sparks novel. I should just stop the review right here, because you already have all of what’s required to make up your mind about the movie and whether you’re likely to enjoy it. Most Sparks novels are built according to a similar melodramatic template, and this similarity is not helped at all by bland casting and unremarkable direction. The story has to do with a soldier making his way back from Iraq to a woman whose picture he found during combat, but really that’s just an extra-melodramatic setup for a “stranger comes into town” plot à la Safe Haven. It ends pretty much how you’d expect, which is tautologically the only way it could end up given the expectations of its audience. If it sounds as if I’m exasperated by the result, that’s true only up to a certain point. Past that, the film delivers exactly what it intends, and there is some atmospheric attractiveness in small-town romance stories with added dramatic flair. (Plus Zac Efron and/or Taylor Schilling. Although I’m getting old enough now that Blythe Danner is starting to look like the cute one in the film.) The Lucky One is the kind of movie that it wants to be, and you’d don’t have to see it if you don’t want to.

Cocktail (1988)

Cocktail (1988)

(In French, On Cable TV, December 2018) I’m not sure when “peak Tom Cruise” actually was, but there’s no denying that his late-1980s popularity following Top Gun was off-the-chart. Most of his projects back then (and still now) banked on his charisma. Cocktail certainly makes a lot of mileage with Cruise’s boyish charm: Here he plays an ambitious young man initially taking up bartending to make ends meet while working toward a business degree. But when his showy bartending earns him more attention than he knows what to do with, it leads to a break-up with his mentor, romantic entanglements and many more money-related complications. It gets very melodramatic very quickly, and the result is a mess that doesn’t quite know what tone to aim for. To be fair, there are a few great moments of the film, especially in the first half as the 1980s atmosphere is most visibly deployed and as the flair bartending style gets a lot of attention. But those moments of greatness probably work against Cocktail as a whole, especially once we’re off to increasingly unlikely and grandiose plot development that suck whatever energy the film was able to create in those moments. I suspect that Cruise’s presence in the film ended up creating part of the atonality problems: Cruise being Cruise, any film producer would want to give him a flashy part, a big smile and a happy ending, whereas a smaller-scale movie with a lesser-known lead actor probably could have delivered a rougher, more authentic drama about the ups and downs in the life of a bartender. Who knows? What’s obvious, though, is that the film doesn’t quite work as a seamless whole. The plot gets more arbitrary, and it feels stuck between down-and-dirty intentions and its star’s megawatt personality. Cocktail doesn’t mix well, and the result can be dumbfounding when seen thirty years later.

Rampage (2018)

Rampage (2018)

(On Cable TV, December 2018) Hey wow—I recall playing Rampage-the-videogame on personal computers in the late 1980s, wowed by a 16-colour palette (EGA forever!) and having rather a lot of fun with it. (I just had a spin through the online abandonware browser emulator and it’s pretty much what I remembered.) Rampage the movie, of course, is something else: A thin excuse to have monsters destroying good chunks of a city, finally proving that seventeen years after 9/11, we’re once again ready to rumble through devastated downtown areas. Dwayne Johnson (who else?) leads the film, playing the kind of superheroes that is de rigueur for that kind of movie. The scientific blablabla is nonsense, but it quickly gets us to the super-monsters destroying cities, albeit with a slightly harder edge than I expected from a big PG-13 movies: there’s some faintly upsetting almost-R violence in the film that I did not necessarily enjoy. Still, Rampage is meant to be dumb fun and it knows it: one of the best non-CGI parts of the film is Jeffrey Dean Morgan as a mysterious scenery-chewing Southern man-in-black kind of special operative stealing every scene he’s in. Johnson is up to his usual leading-man standard (but is he getting overexposed?) while Naomie Harris is always enjoyable to look at—this film not being an exception. Of course, the point of Rampage is seeing Downtown Chicago landmarks being destroyed as thoroughly as possible—surely I can’t be the only one thinking about a Rampage/Transformers 3 mash-up? The film is both better and worse than expected: better in that it delivers the goods and keeps moving, with some great special-effects sequences along the way. Worse, because of the too-high level of violence, and overall impression that we’ve seen urban destruction so often lately (even in director Brad Peyton’s oeuvre, as per the somewhat more ludicrously enjoyable San Andreas) that Rampage is going to sink back into anonymity within months.

The Freshman (1990)

The Freshman (1990)

(On Cable TV, December 2018) Well huh. Turns out that Marlon Brando was a trend setter on his way up, playing characters with raw honesty in the 1950s, and also on his way down, anticipating the whole self-parody of people such as Robert de Niro with 1990’s The Freshman. The references are not accidental—The Freshman features Brando as a mob boss in a film that has characters (including a film teacher) obsessing over The Godfather. It’s intentional, and it does work relatively well at times: Brando doesn’t look as if he’s having any fun whatsoever, but the characters grimacing around him look as if they do. Matthew Broderick stars as a hapless Midwesterner going to NYC to study film, and is immediately robbed upon arrival. We later discover it’s all a big scheme, but never mind the details. The Freshman is merely fine as a comedy: It doesn’t have big laughs, it does’nt build to an amazing climax, but it does the job of entertaining and that’s that. Director Andrew Bergman keeps things moving in the same direction, Penelope Ann Miller makes for a cute love interest and the focus on animals means some visual comedy as well. I don’t think that The Freshman has any staying power beyond seeing Brando poking fun at himself, even in a very restrained way. But it’ll do if you haven’t seen it yet.

Lance et Compte (2010)

Lance et Compte (2010)

(In French, On TV, December 2018) For French-Canadians of the past two generations, Lance et Compte is a TV classic. It began in the late 1980s as one of the first French-Canadian TV shows to adopt a more cinematic style and subject matter, à l’américaine as it moved away from dinner-table conversations and into the fast-paced, high-stakes world of hockey that has become Québec’s secular religion. I still remember schoolyard conversations about the first season of the TV show, the dead-on parody “Snappe pis bourdonne” by comic group Rock et Belles Oreilles and the national media attention given to the show. I stopped following it a few seasons later, but the show has been revived a few times in the thirty years since then, with TV movies and miniseries always extending the lives of the characters without a single reboot. The movie Lance et Compte fits into this long-running continuity by taking place between two seasons of the latest revival, featuring some characters first introduced during the TV show’s first season in the late eighties. I did not know that when I first saw the film—I presumed that it was going to be a reboot. So imagine my surprise in discovering both familiar and unfamiliar characters, trying to piece together nearly twenty years of accumulated backstory through quick conversations and passing references to past events in the show. This being said, the film does tell a specific story: How a bus accident decimates a professional hockey team, and how the team manages to get past this traumatic incident. It actually works decently well once you straighten out the character relationships, with a few surprising twists and turns as the film tries to bring back some characters (Yvan Ponton, for one) and finds out that it can’t. Series stalwart Marc Messier, Carl Marotte, Marina Orsini and Michel Forget all have good roles to play (Marotte, in particular, stages a great comeback), and even some of the most dubious plotting ideas—such as rescuing a Québec-based shoe brand—eventually work their way back into the main plot. Then there’s the paean to hockey, which always works for French-Canadians—even those who, like me, have lapsed a bit in their attendance. Slickly directed by Frédéric D’Amours, Lance et Compte plays into a fantasy-based version of professional hockey where city and team loyalties are nearly as thick as family ties—don’t try to make any comparison with the mercenary world of real-life hockey where allegiances are thin and money makes decisions. Still, it’s comforting to imagine people still being there twenty-five years later. Much of the movie rests on that kind of reassurance.

Lady Chatterly’s Lover (1981)

Lady Chatterly’s Lover (1981)

(In French, On TV, December 2018) When D. H. Lawrence sat down to write Lady Chatterly’s Lover, I’m not sure that he envisioned it being turned into an exploitative soft-core erotic thriller. Or maybe he did—the novel is celebrated for having struck down all sorts of obscenity laws during the 1950s–1960s and the author clearly intended it to push back the limits of free speech. Still, that doesn’t excuse boring movie adaptations. On a commercial basis, this 1981 version of Lady Chatterly’s Lover exists on solid ground: It was a reunion between director Just Jaeckin and star Sylvia Kristel for the first time since the soft-core-classic Emmanuelle. Alas, the white-gauze cinematography, languorous close-ups of Kristel’s body and lengthy lovemaking sequences mean that the film is aimed at voyeurs more than audiences interested in narrative substance. The result is incredibly dull, although I suppose that it remains notable for featuring a generous amount of female-gaze eroticism and not solely male titillation. (The introduction of the titular lover, for instance, is through a very long sequence in which the heroine stares at him taking a shower outdoors.) I can imagine circumstances where Lady Chatterly’s Lover would be a fun movie to watch as a couple, but it’s a very different kind of movie-watching experience than this movie critic taking notes and measuring it against the overall, um, thrust of 1980s cinema.

The Candidate (1972)

The Candidate (1972)

(In French, On TV, December 2018) Over a sufficiently long timeline, one of the problems with the world is its tendency to evolve toward a parody of itself, becoming the thing that earlier generations tried to satirize. So it is that I finished watching The Candidate having found it a reasonably tame description of an American political campaign, only to read up on the film and find out that it had been conceived as a satirical comedy. Of course, satire is dead under the current American presidency, and so The Candidate does appear a bit staid today, dealing with a far gentler and more rational era in US politics. This, mind you, is not necessarily a problem—I’m a political junkie and I’m more receptive than most to a movie taking us through an entire senatorial campaign without resorting to huge melodramatic twists à la Primary Colors or The Ides of March. (Which is for the better, given that most post-Clinton US political thrillers seemed to have the same resolution in mind.) Robert Redford is quite good in the film, playing an idealistic candidate who progressively waters down his message in an effort to be elected. The film seems to regard this as a soul-destroying process, but I may be showing my progressivist centric technocrat inner nature when I say that this feels perfectly reasonable and perhaps even admirable. The film isn’t without its funny moments, although some minor plot threads (such as the candidate’s affair with a staffer) get lost in the mix, and I don’t quite think that the protagonist gets a good chance to show his late-campaign desire to win taking over his idealistic convictions. It’s also dated in terms of references and technology but come on: It’s a forty-six-year-old movie. As such, The Candidate has aged nicely enough. I’ll add it to my growing list of essential movies about American politics.

Finian’s Rainbow (1968)

Finian’s Rainbow (1968)

(On Cable TV, December 2018) Being right doesn’t mean much when you’re late, and unfortunately that’s the first conclusion I get from watching Finian’s Rainbow, an old-fashioned musical that has the right moral values about racism but the rotten luck of making it to theatres one year after movies such as In the Heat of the Night and Guess who’s Coming to Dinner completely changed the Hollywood conversation about racial injustice in the United States. As New Hollywood was remaking the film industry in a far different image, Finian’s Rainbow was torn between new issues and old-fashioned style, featuring no less than Fred Astaire singing and dancing about racial injustice while dealing with a meddlesome leprechaun trying to get its gold back. Yeah… I’m not making this up. It’s a musical in the purest tradition of the form, but it would have been so much better had it been made ten years earlier. Astaire isn’t bad, but he looks truly old here—I mean: he never looked young even when he was, but here age has visibly caught up to him, and his great dance routines look almost dangerous. Petunia Clark is fine as his daughter, but much of the comedy and remarkable performances come from other players (including Tommy Steele as a hyper-caffeinated leprechaun) in this bizarre southern state/Irish-mythology mash-up. The film’s message against racial discrimination goes through an incredibly racist character being magically transformed into a black person (hello blackface) in time to travel with a small group of singers—the song is great (“The Begat”), but everything leading to it has issues of some sort. Plus, it’s directed by none other than Francis Ford Coppola. Finian’s Rainbow, as you can guess, is a strange blend—sometimes great, sometimes endearing, sometimes dumbfounding and sometimes uncomfortable. It’s certainly interesting, but I’m going to stop myself from calling it a must-watch.