Sophie Marceau

  • La boum 2 (1982)

    (On TV, May 2022) Feeling more like an episode than a sequel, La boum 2 takes us back to the family of the first film two years later, now with one extra family member (a mostly-inconsequential baby) and our teenage heroine ready for some serious romance. A young Sophie Marceau (with better hair) plays a fifteen-year-old who, coming back to school after a summer in Germany, gets more serious about dating, even as her parents undergo the sequel-mandated chill in their relationship. Clearly focused on breakout star Marceau, this sequel skimps on the titular parties as well, only awkwardly shoving one such sequence near the end as it to fulfil contractual obligations. Once again, Marceau is likable, Brigitte Fossey looks amazing and Denise Grey steals her scenes. (There’s even a young Lambert Wilson in the cast.)  Still, La boum 2 isn’t much of a film – it pleasantly continues the adventures of the characters from the previous film, so you need to be a fan in order to get the most out of this sequel.

  • La boum (1980)

    (On TV, May 2022) I can’t say I enjoyed La boum all that much, but as far as “French slide-of-life” films go, it’s relatively painless, maybe even amusing at times. Focusing on a thirteen-year-old girl (the film debut of a young and nearly unrecognizable Sophie Marceau, underneath an unflattering haircut) having to balance school, life and love as her parents near separation and divorce, the film is resolutely low-stakes as it follows its family of three (or four if you include the pleasantly uninhibited great-grandmother played by Denise Grey) as they go through quotidian episodes. Occasionally, a scene makes an impression – for instance, the revenge scene of the female lead (the superb Brigitte Fossey) on her husband’s mistress, in which she thoroughly smashes a perfume store. At other times, we’re simply left to contemplate the characters in their imperfections and quirks. La boum, despite being as low-octane as possible, does have the advantage of being likable and watchable – which is a great deal more than one can say about many, many navel-gazing character-driven French films.

  • The World Is Not Enough (1999)

    The World Is Not Enough (1999)

    (In theaters, November 1999) A mixture of the excitingly new and the distressingly familiar. Things start off in a promising fashion, with an extended pre-credit snippet that features an inventive action scene and intriguing new elements (Bond making mistakes, etc…) Unfortunately, the film loses steam as it goes along, only to end on a trite conventional finale that barely elicits anything beyond vague satisfaction. The villain Renard is, again, promisingly introduced (he cannot feel any pain!) but wasted in a role that could have been filled by anyone else. At least the series’ vaunted sex-appeal is distressingly high, what with Sophie Marceau and Denise Richards. Plus, Pierce Brosnan finally proves without a doubt that he’s the best James Bond since Sean Connery. The World Is Not Enough, however, is an average Bond film at best, satisfying without being truly interesting.

    (Second viewing, On VHS, August 2001) Like most blockbusters cursed with a strong whiff of stupidity, this is one film that’s not quite as offensive the second time around. Just as forgiving the American Godzilla‘s brain-damaged script makes subsequent viewings oddly endearing, this James Bond adventure might even work better the second time around, if only because you now know when to pay attention. (It helps to have a good book handy to use during the boring parts, of which there are quite a few, all things considered. Is it ironic that the last fifteen minutes are among the most boring? I can’t decide.) This being said, Sophie Marceau turns up in looking great as an unusual Bond girl, while Denise Richard’s overall performance really starts to grate. (I think she’s attractive… but her delivery might be improved by sleep, unconsciousness or a long coma. “Unconvincing” is a gentle word to describe her work. I’ll just rent Wild Things again.) Still think that Brosnan’s the best Bond, close behind Connery. Still think that whatever the faults, James Bond films are good fun.