Movie Review

  • The King (2019)

    The King (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) It’s been scant hours since I’ve seen The King, and the film is already a blur of fuzzy memories, largely undistinguishable from other similar films. Telling us about Henry V’s first years in power, it’s dirty, grimy and thoroughly not fun. The acting talent is fine (what with such notables at Timothée Chalamet, Joel Edgerton, Robert Pattinson and Ben Mendelsohn) and the script relies equally on loose adaptations from historical facts and Shakespearian plays. But the result, ugh – you may want to get out on the next cold rainy day, roll yourself in the mud and spend a few days without electricity and have a more entertaining experience. It does get a bit more interesting late in the third act with a depiction of the Battle of Agincourt, but even a film as dull and gritty as The King can’t escape substantial deviation from historical fact – it’s almost as much fun to fact-check the film than watch it in the first place. It’s as featureless and generic as its title suggests – I was barely reminded of 2018’s Outlaw King (also released via Netflix), and it’s not a favourable comparison.

  • Problem Child (1990)

    Problem Child (1990)

    (In French, On Cable TV, December 2020) The 1980s weren’t exactly the sanest decade for movies, and as Problem Child shows, corruption went all the way to so-called kids’ movies. It does take a special kind of studio executive to greenlight a kid’s film that plays on black comedy, where the hero eventually ditches his wife in favour of an incorrigible seven-year-old. But that’s the kind of film it is: Destructive pranks, dangerous jokes and a serial killer as an antagonist. The title character is deliberately portrayed as abrasive with few redeeming qualities until the expected middle-film shift. Problem Child goes so far as upend traditional values by focusing on the growing father-son bond, with the increasingly evil wife being stuffed in a suitcase and sent to Mexico (this is not a metaphor). The script clearly shows a satirical intent that seems undermined by director Dennis Dugan otherwise following “heartwarming” family film traditions to a ridiculous intent – few will be surprised to learn that the studio insisted on numerous changes throughout production in order to end not with a satire but a family film… except that the seams still show a disjointed result. Again, no wonder if Problem Child has become a minor cult classic since its release: it’s bonkers in very weird and specific ways, and any film that has viewers thinking, “I can’t believe this was ever made” has an advantage over a terminally forgettable one.

  • Can’t Buy Me Love (1987)

    Can’t Buy Me Love (1987)

    (In French, On Cable TV, December 2020) If teenage rom-com Can’t Buy Me Love feels so familiar, I’m guessing it’s as much for how it whole-heartedly embraces the most familiar clichés of the high school romance genre as for how it’s been imitated later on by a slew of similar films. Here we have the usual buzzwords and tropes: jocks-versus-nerds, sensitive teenagers writing poetry, fake-pretence love turning real, social ostracism as the overriding value, etc. In other words, it feels incredibly predictable and familiar even when it’s not too badly handled. Much of the lingering trouble, seen almost twenty-five years later, had to do with the film’s refusal to even acknowledge its own limitations in playing high school social status-seeking straight: more recent similar films would poke at their own assumptions. But Can’t Buy Me Love doesn’t – it’s as conventional as you can imagine and that does take away from the decent work by the actors, the straightforward narrative rhythm and its basic likability. Patrick Dempsey and Amanda Peterson do rather well as the lead couple, which saves the film from further indignities. Not all high school movies are created equal, obviously, and 1980s ones don’t have the perspective that later examples benefit from.

  • Murder Mystery (2019)

    Murder Mystery (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) If you believe in the documented theory that Adam Sandler picks projects partially in order to get paid holidays in picturesque locations with a bunch of his friends, then Murder Mystery becomes almost inevitable. The premise is familiar enough, as a couple of ordinary Americans become embroiled in an escalating series of murders among the European jet-set. It’s executed with the very, very broad humour of Sandler’s other films, and Jennifer Anniston should be used to the proceedings given that this is her second pairing with him. The result is a decent comedy, although there’s a sense that it’s dragged down by the personas of its lead actors: While the plot outline of Murder Mystery is solid enough, the film seems contractually obliged to sabotage itself in order to let Sandler or Anniston showboat. It could have been a cleverer film (the twists and turns of the finale almost make sense) but that’s really not what Murder Mystery is interested in, as it moves from a yacht to the picturesque French Riviera. It’s no real surprise if the film does better with its supporting characters: Terence Stamp makes a brief impression, whereas Luke Evans and Gemma Atherton do better. It’s interesting to see noteworthy French comedian Danny Boon take a role as a crusty French policeman in an American film –Jean Reno and Vincent Cassel finally have a successor! The result, to be clear, is still reasonably entertaining… even if it coasts on the familiar appeal of a classical murder mystery with ordinary people tackling the case. It could have been worse, but somehow, I keep judging Murder Mystery on the ways it could have been much better, starting with different lead actors.

  • Triple Frontier (2019)

    Triple Frontier (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) Perhaps the best thing about Triple Frontier is how it embraces a kind of adventure film rarely seen these days: a tale of men in a foreign country, fighting against various obstacles in order to get to achieve their objectives. It’s not too heavy on the action scenes, allows several well-known actors (Oscar Isaac, Ben Affleck, Charlie Hunnam and Pedro Pascal) a chance to shine in dramatic roles, and seems inspired by no less than The Treasure of the Sierra Madres. Despite all of this, why does it feel like such a chore to watch? Part of the answer is that there’s nothing noble here – here we have bored ex-military characters turning to the mercenary lifestyle in the search for money, and all eventually being consumed by greed. The money may come from narco-traficantes, but the people they end up fighting against turn out to be civilians, teenagers and villagers. No wonder if Triple Frontier, despite some interesting material, becomes such a slog. Writer JC Chandor should be credited for once again attempting a film much unlike anything else in his filmography (although the sense of adventure does echo All is Lost) and wrangling an impressive cast along the way. But the characters fade against the adventures, the film fails to distinguish itself when it comes to execution and the thrills really aren’t all that thrilling once the journey is over for the survivors. (Plot issues of the “anyone could think a better plan than the one they’re following” variety also harm the result.) Triple Frontier does have some heft and chooses to be downbeat in its development, and that ultimately weighs against the result rather than enhance it.

  • While the City Sleeps (1956)

    While the City Sleeps (1956)

    (On Cable TV, December 2020) The more I discover lesser-known movies from the 1950s, the more I realize that, despite the conformist fairytale that many would like to make you believe about the decade, it was filled with social criticism, technological doubts and satires about the post-WW2 order. While the City Sleeps benefits from the outsider’s gaze of director Fritz Lang: it is at its core a crime drama that becomes an excuse to examine the growing power of media in American society. When a media magnate dies as a serial killer terrifies the city, the directors of the three divisions of his empire (newswire, newspaper and television) are encouraged to find the killer first in order to secure a prestigious new job. As an excuse to study the tensions between personal gain and news ethics, While the City Sleeps exploits its plotting for all it’s worth: the directors scheme and draw audacious plans that directly put others in danger in an attempt to seize the headlines (and accessorily catch the killer). A great cast complements the story – Dana Andrews at the protagonist, a suitably slimy Vincent Price as an underestimated heir, George Sanders as one of the competing directors and a great-looking Ida Lupino as a clever writer. It all amounts to an absorbing film, clearly going beyond film-noir clichés to attempt an ambitious study of how personal greed can corrupt institutions meant to be trusted by the public. It’s suitably cynical at a high level, but can rely on a likable protagonist to anchor the film. Lang’s Hollywood career was not perfect, but I don’t recall truly disliking any of his films during that period. While the City Sleeps is no exception.

  • The Gentlemen (2019)

    The Gentlemen (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) Every few years, writer-director Guy Richie uses the box-office clout of his for-hire projects in order to go back to his criminal comedy roots. The Gentlemen is the latest entry in his stronger filmography subset, and it feels like the best thing he’s done since Rocknrolla. As with Richie at his finest, the film is a dizzying blend of criminal capers, strong characters, delicious dialogue and fast-paced editing, making good use of a non-chronological, unreliably narrated story. The fun begins as a journalist (Hugh Grant in one of his strongest and slimiest characters) breaks into the house of a criminal fixer (Charlie Hunnam, surprisingly good) to tell him about the troubles for his employer, an American expat (Matthew McConaughey) looking to diversify his cannabis empire now that decriminalization is coming fast. The multi-stranded, exuberant plot is simultaneously integral to the experience of the film and somewhat of a second thought as it showcases other things. Richie fans will be happy to see him deliver on male fashion exemplars and a great working-level look at London. But the centrepiece here is the dialogue: inventive, profane and elaborate – it comes out of the characters like soliloquies, as they delight in the power of words. (Significantly enough, the most reprehensive characters are also the least florid.) Its willingness to go hard for provocative content does mean that The Gentlemen is all too willing to go for racist and sexist content – but it feels like a price to pay for a film with dialogue this good and a suitably convoluted story. By the end, The Gentlemen even indulges in metafictional irony and side-glances at the unrealized sequels to previous Richie movies. It’s mesmerizing viewing, bolstered by uniformly great performances from actors drawn out of their personas by Richie’s script. (Just wait until you see Colin Farrell’s character – he’s been terrific as a character actor for the past decade, but he gets a really good supporting turn here.) The Gentlemen, needless to say, will not be for everyone: it’s violent, crass, a bit self-satisfied and definitely aimed at a specific audience. But it’s great to have Richie go slumming again in criminal London after working for Disney.

  • 6 Underground (2019)

    6 Underground (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) Even in the best circumstances, I have very mixed feelings about Michael Bay movies. 6 Underground is a good example of that: moments of visual kinetic brilliance, constantly undermined by an ugly script and an even more loathsome attitude. To be fair, we’ve known since Bad Boys II that Bay, when given an R rating, will turn into an outspoken psychopath: it’s not enough to have violence when there can be gory violence, and black comedy cedes way to sociopathic disregard for elemental human decency. But 6 Underground takes it another step further by wallowing into ugliness from top to bottom: Troublingly enough, it adopts vigilantism as an ethos, making a hero out of a billionaire who eschews any kind of accountability in favour of globetrotting unsanctioned violence. Having that character played by Ryan Reynolds certainly softens the blow, but anyone taking a step back from the film’s unquestioned assumptions should be worried: killing people in increasingly grand-guignolesque ways seems to be all right as long as you’ve got money and impeccable justification, which only works in the movies. 6 Underground has a fetish-like devotion to the idea of characters faking their deaths, which apparently grants them superhuman powers or something like that. Much of its most pretentious musings could have been acceptable in a more tonally controlled film, but 6 Underground doesn’t have the patience or the focus to be consistent: it veers from juvenile comedy to eyeball-gouging violence in an instant, barely stopping to make good use of its own strengths. Because, yes, for all of the immature bloodthirstiness and glorification of unaccountable murder, there are a few good moments here and there. True to his reputation as a purveyor of Bayhem, there are two strong sequences that rival anything else in the contemporary action cinema canon: a fast-paced car chase through Florence, and a gunfight atop a high-rise with an ominously large aquarium. Trim the excessive violence and you’d have something significantly better. (I’d like vigilantism to go as well, but I’m being realistic – America will only give up its dreams and aspirations to arbitrarily kill anyone it wants from its cold dead hands.) I am interested in 6 Underground for its technical prowess in assembling a fast-paced action film, and utterly repulsed at its embrace of psychopathy at all levels. It wouldn’t be a Michael Bay movie otherwise.

  • The Decline of Western Civilization (1981)

    The Decline of Western Civilization (1981)

    (On Cable TV, December 2020) In retrospect, even mildly successful documentaries can be ennobled by the passage of time if they capture something that can no longer be experienced in later years. In this light, The Decline of Western Civilization is a much better documentary now than it was at its release because its insider’s look at the 1980 Los Angeles punk scene is now the stuff of legend, never again to be recreated. To be clear, The Decline of Western Civilization was never a bad movie: much of what it chronicles, in between generous concert footage and revealing interviews with various punk scene members, was under-covered at the time. Director Penelope Spheeris (best known for Wayne’s World) was a member of the scene at the time, and was able to use her friendships to set up the interviews and film the performances. The result is a document for the ages – a good punk anthology, complemented by a description of the scene by the scene members themselves. I’m not that familiar with punk nor any of the bands here (although I do recognize Black Flag, even if that’s more due to the later presence of Henry Rollins than anything else) but I had a good time listening to much of The Decline of Western Civilization while doing something else.

  • … All the Marbles (1981)

    … All the Marbles (1981)

    (On Cable TV, December 2020) Peter Falk with forever be Colombo, but his film career is filled with hits, from his dead-on Bogart impersonation in Murder by Death to a very odd turn in City of Angels to, well, a rather decent turn in female wrestling drama movie…all the Marbles. Here we are, clearly in the early 1980s, following a female tag-team wrestling team and their manager (Falk) as they tour the decaying pockets of the United States interested in female wrestling, going from one terrible hotel room to a low-rent venue, always looking for bigger and better engagements. It’s a miserable living and an equally miserable movie at first, as the lead trio keeps squabbling, running into trouble and losing faith in their ability to succeed. Things eventually change for the better in the film’s later half, as the protagonists move west for greater and greater success. It all culminates at a Reno face-off with their biggest opponents, an event during which Falk’s character demonstrates his talent for working the crowd. As an underdog sports comedy, it features the expected comeback and the marginally happier finale than the film’s opening moments. Falk is quite good here, with his gravelly voice reflecting a man who knows he’s spiralling down but always clinging to the hope of a break. While the film is not always pleasant to watch, it does build to something better. I’m reminded of the adage “three good scenes and a great finale” – you really can’t go wrong with a big final victory.

  • El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie (2019)

    El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) Like many people, I binge-watched “Breaking Bad” as soon as the entire series made its way to Netflix in 2016ish. Picking up the pieces of the series’ plot in time for El Camino wasn’t as difficult as I would have guessed: while the film dutifully continues the events of the last episode as if no time at all had passed, it also revisits many of the series’ characters in such a way that you can easily remember who was who and what they did. The cameos are usually in increasing order of significance, so just wait and you’ll see your favourites at some point. Acting as more of a bonus coda than anything specifically new, El Camino focuses on Jesse as he escapes from the neo-Nazi compound, then spends the next few days putting his affairs in order and getting enough money to start a new life. Taking its cues from TV show structure, El Camino often feels like a series of short loop episodes, with Jessie dealing with a specific challenge before moving on to the next stage. Robert Forster makes an impression (in one of his last film roles) as an inflexible “cleaner,” and the film does get a pretty good sequence, as Jessie looks for hidden money in the lair of a dead nemesis. (Jesse Plemons is back in his irritatingly evil character, proving the banality of evil in many different ways.) El Camino is probably not work a look if you’re not already a viewer of the show: the story is decent, the production values are nice, but the film doesn’t really intend to stand alone nor offer meaning to anyone but those wanting another hit of “Breaking Bad.” Nothing wrong with that – just setting expectations straight.

  • The Irishman (2019)

    The Irishman (2019)

    (Netflix Streaming, December 2020) To anyone closely keeping track of Martin Scorsese’s career, The Irishman arrives as a clear late-career entry – the kind of film that plays as much as a narrative as a reflection of the films previously made under his direction. At first glance, it does look like many of Scorsese’s celebrated crime epics: a multi-decade odyssey through the murky world of east-coast union corruption, organized crime and veteran hitmen. It features Robert de Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci, with special effects technology used to portray them from the 1950s to the 2000s. It has flashes of Scorsese’s directing style at its most vivid, with individual sequences playing like virtuoso riffs on the content of the film: There’s a particularly good sequence midway through in which a hitman ponders his choices for an upcoming hit, prepares and executes it despite not exactly going to plan. But, at the same time, The Irishman does play like a pre-retirement capstone, as the director deals heavily in themes that make more sense from an older filmmaker’s perspective. There is a moment where the narration sends nearly every single character to death or retirement, and you’re sure that this is the end of the film. But there are still thirty minutes and an unresolved framing device to go, and that’s when The Irishman strikes out in its own territory – telling us about the uneasy retirement of an accomplished hitman, the estrangement from his family, the gradual disappearance of his friends and the inevitable press of time, transforming a stone-cold killer in a frail old man liable to be taken out by even the slightest health problem. That’s what transforms The Irishman into something special, and something that befits Scorsese’s evolving filmography: he’s not putting together Mean Streets anymore. Of course, there’s a price to pay for such a substantial epilogue: the film is very long and feels even longer as the years go by and we dig ourselves out of no less than two framing devices and various flashbacks. There are a lot of characters to follow, and the way the film fits in history, often in oblique detail, is meant to be interpreted by those who have a decent grasp of post-WW2 American history, and specifically everything about Jimmy Hoffa. Some will argue that The Irishman would have done best as a miniseries, and, curiously enough, I only half-agree with that statement: Scorsese makes movies, not episodes of a TV show, and while that’s a distinction increasingly irrelevant to anyone but purists, it’s still a significant difference in matters of filmography. I enjoyed it, but I was really wishing for faster pacing at times. Still, The Irishman is an important milestone in Scorsese’s ongoing work: while we may wish for him to keep working forever, it does feel like the kind of work that can stand as a capstone.

  • Running on Empty (1988)

    Running on Empty (1988)

    (On Cable TV, December 2020) I didn’t expect to develop much sympathy for the adult protagonists of Running on Empty. As the film quickly sketches out, here are two ex-activists who ended up maiming a janitor in a laboratory bombing in the 1970s, then spending the 15 previous years on the run while raising two boys. Who can empathize with people like that? Fortunately, though, the emphasis of the film is on their elder son, a gifted pianist who is getting fed up with uprooting himself every few years, as his parents are terrified of being discovered by the authorities and keep a nomadic lifestyle. The script does a fine job of portraying the toll that regular uprooting can take, especially outside a controlled context providing support. The protagonist is played by River Phoenix, going a rather good job as the one most affected by the decisions of his parents. There’s a mixture of social drama and paranoid thriller going on here, especially when the runaways themselves keep suffering for not turning themselves in. From a narrative perspective, Running on Empty is messy: While it has a clear moral centre in the eldest son, it does spend some time on tangents related to other family members – it shouldn’t work, but somehow it coheres into a strong conclusion that is no less effective from being predictable long in advance. Director Sidney Lumet is at ease with a complex, politically aware script, and the cleanliness of his work does much to untangle a script filled with tangents.

  • Moulin Rouge (1952)

    Moulin Rouge (1952)

    (On Cable TV, December 2020) There is a particular charm to the way Hollywood used to make biopics – a mixture of caricature, big stars in famous people’s roles, mannered filmmaking and some very specific idea of what a “prestige” picture could be. So it is that in Moulin Rouge, we head to late 19th-century Paris to learn about the life of Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, as played by José Ferrer. The attraction to the topic should be obvious: Toulouse-Lautrec was a genius and a tortured man – physically stunted due to a childhood accident, unlucky in love, spectacularly alcoholic and perpetually living close to poverty. He incarnated much of what many people imagine when they think about troubled artists in the 1890s. For 178cm Ferrer, taking on the role of 152cm Toulouse-Lautrec meant undergoing a physical transformation and making good use of unusual filmmaking techniques such as trenches, fake knees and body doubles. Then there’s the visual attraction of the topic: It would have been unthinkable, even in the 1950s, to shoot Moulin Rouge in anything but colour. The musical numbers are, of course, very can-can: I strongly suspect that most of what we think of as being the aesthetics of the Moulin Rouge (or that period), including the 2001 version of Moulin Rouge!, can be traced back to this film. Absinthe shows up (naturally), as do dark stockings and garter pants. The character of Toulouse-Lautrec perfectly fits the colourful, seedy, exhilarating world created here: Director John Huston knew what he was doing, and the result is a film that deserved its Academy Award nominations. Ferrer is quite good, and there are other known names, such as Zsa Zsa Gabor, Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee in the cast. The 2001 Moulin Rouge! (which doesn’t share much than the title and the setting) is one of my favourite movies of all time, but this 1952 title is perfectly likable in its own way.

  • Torn Curtain (1966)

    Torn Curtain (1966)

    (On Cable TV, November 2020) With Torn Curtain, I have reached the end of Alfred Hitchcock’s second tier of films—I think that the only remaining movies I haven’t watched by him are the practically obscure The Paradine Case, Under Capricorn, and after that we get into 1930s British movies and 1920s silent films. Working from a popularity-based list, I am clearly going backward through quality as well: Made between Marnie and Topaz, Torn Curtain is clearly not among Hitchcock’s best, although it does have a few highlights. The best one of those is something I either somehow didn’t know or had forgotten: Paul Newman in a Hitchcock film?! He’s clearly not the best choice for the kind of cool thriller that Hitchcock did best (and it’s easy to confuse the opening minutes of Torn Curtain with that of The Prize), but much of his innate charm still makes quite an impression. On the other hand, Newman being Newman means that we’re not fooled when the film tries to make him a traitor defecting to the east. Fortunately, that’s not meant to be a twist—and that’s part of the film’s problem, as it keeps going on long after a blackboard combat that should have been the climax of the film. There are sequences that fare better, but even in those moments, the specifics don’t quite match the desired impression—I get that the kitchen sequence is meant to drive the point home that it’s hard to kill someone, but there are about six different better weapons on the set to finish off the guy than sticking his head in an oven. Julie Andrews is there but fails to make much of an impression as the woman who follows her fiancé deep behind the Iron Curtain and back. It’s no secret that Hitchcock did better on more personal movies than when he tried to go geopolitical (Topaz would confirm that a few years later) and so Torn Curtain seems a bit scattered compared to his better movies—it’s still watchable, but not always compelling.