Anathem, Neal Stephenson

[Cover]

Morrow, 2008, 937 pages, C$31.95 hc, ISBN 978-0-06-147409-5

Being a dialogue between a not-entirely-satisfied reader and Neal Stephenson’s Anathem:

Anathem: Hey, reader. Do you know what I am?

Reader: (Rolling eyes): Yeah, yeah, you’re Neal Stephenson’s latest brick-sized novel. Obviously, he wasn’t listening when everyone complained about the Baroque Trilogy. Did you know that I still haven’t read those books? When will I find the time to do it?

Anathem: But you read me! Am I not clever, or what?

Reader: You were also nominated for a Hugo Award shortly before I got stuck for three days in one of the dullest cities in Canada with nothing to do but read anything close by. So don’t flatter yourself.

Anathem: I dismiss the rest of the Hugo Shortlist. I’m smarter than all of them combined.

Reader: A propensity toward glossolalia doesn’t necessarily correlate with genius. The fact that you’re incomprehensible without a made-up dictionary doesn’t make you any smarter than the wicked storytelling of Neil Gaiman’s Graveyard Book, nor any more engaged than Cory Doctorow’s Little Brother, nor any more sarcastically likable than John Scalzi’s Zoe’s Tale nor more interesting than the truckload of ideas in Charles Stross’ Saturn’s Childen. Try stopping being less full of yourself and we’ll talk on more amiable terms.

Anathem: But… surely you must be impressed by how I re-invent much of human philosophy and science in barely less than a thousand pages!

Reader: I hate to break it to you, but it’s been done before. Thousands of students do it every year, and they’re using the real words, not poisoning the information well of its audience with a made-up mythology. I understand that your point is to show off how intelligent you are, but that’s where our conceptions of the novel-as-a-novel may clash: Reinventing philosophy is not something I need from my pleasure reading.

Anathem: But, but, but! You always say you like fiction that make you think!

Reader: I also enjoy reading books that don’t send me back to my freshman year manuals in order to do my homework. You’re also ignoring the crucial point: I don’t mind a bit of thinking in addition to my fiction, but I mind when it displaces it. Face it: how much of a story is in your nine-hundred pages? How quickly would a more efficient author been able to tell it with a reasonable amount of detail?

Anathem: You’re being unfair! I am a beacon of intellectual rigour and ambition in a wasteland of mere entertainment! You’re just indulging in cheap contrarianism for the sake of a querulous review!

Reader: I’m perpetually guilty of contrarian sarcasm, but it comes from the heart. Look: You’re just too long and convoluted for your own good.

Anathem: Ah, but admit it; after so long spent living in my world, you’re proud of what you have achieved! You’re feeling better for the effort you’ve spend reading me!

Reader: So, what, you’re supposed to be my tough-love thousand-page buddy now? Did you see where I shelved Atlas Shrugged in my bookshelves?

Anathem: (Horrified) Not… the… humor section?

Reader: Fortunately for you, you’re too much of a stick-in-the-mud to be classified as funny.

Anathem: But I’m the smartest book you’ve read this year, right?

Reader: (Exasperated) Yes you are. Now here’s five bucks to go buy yourself a coffee.

Anathem: (Walking away) Woo-hoo! I’m the “smartest book of the year”!

Web Site Report – April 2009

Ready for another look at the dull routine of an obscure web site? Here are the monthly highlights for christian-sauve.com:

 

1. Mmm. Numbers…

My prickly "Urchin" web stats engine tells me that…

Report for: christian-sauve.com, April 2009 Total Visitors      6,985   Total Pageviews    19,658   (Corrected total   11,294) Total Hits         22,016   Total Bytes Transferred   393.6MB   Average Visitors Per Day  232.83   Average Pageviews Per Day 655.26   (Corrected average    376) Average Hits Per Day      733.86   

The "corrected" numbers take out the CSS, robots.txt, PDFs, mis-filed graphic files (ICO, GIF, JPG) and other non-public files mistakenly considered "pages" by the statistics pre-digestion engine. All numbers were significantly lower than last month, which I blame on fibre-eating badgers.

Meanwhile, Google Analytics slaps me on the head by using its sophisticated algorithms to prove that I really had only 883 visits and 1,464 pageviews. This may be a downer, but Google, at least, thinks my stats are up from last month.

 

According to Urchin, our top ten most popular pages are

 /index.html                     804 /texts/solaris-explanation.htm  323 /texts/free-movie-tickets.htm   219 /reviews.html                   210 /about.html                     179 /contact.html                   178 /links.html                     174 /writings.html                  168 /search.html                    162 /francais/index.html            114 

Little change here. Meanwhile, Google Analytics says…

1. /texts/solaris-explanation.htm 257
2. /reviews/index.html 197
3. /index.html 116
4. /francais/index.html 42
5. /reviews.html 41
6. /contact.html 22
7. /reviews/2004/reviews-2004-08august.html 22
8. /links.htm 21
9. /reviews/2003/books03j.htm 18
10. /search.html 17

…which is roughly consistent with the usual results.

 

If you care about such things, (And you should!), here’s a look at browser statistics for the month (by visitors), as provided by the clever gerbils at Google Analytics:

  Browser This Month Last Month
1. IE 7.0 310 267
2 Firefox (all) 265 250
3 IE 6.0 79 77
4 Safari (all) 73 50

Not much movement this month, although the surge in Safari visitors may or may not mean anything.

 

2. Where do these people come from?

According to Urchin, our top five sources of referrals (in visitors) were

 google.com/search     688 (589) www.google.ca/search  104 (121) live.com/results.aspx  75 (112) google.com/books       74 (76) google.co.uk/search    53 (53) 

As you may expect by now, Google Analytics has a slightly different view of the situation:

  Source This Month Last Month
1. google / organic 595 507
2. yahoo / organic 22 23
3. en.wikipedia.org / referral 13 18
4. aol / organic 6 10
5. books.google.com / referral 6 -

(Lingo key: "Organic" is Google’s way of saying that no one has paid for links leading back to christian-sauve.com on those search engines. "Referral" is supposed to be a direct link to this site.)

Google now lists about 3130 links for "Christian Sauvé", down from last month. A look at the top-100 results showed no important new links.

 

3. Ohh! Visitor comments!

Spaaaaam. It just never stops.

 

4. Search Queries Oddities

According to Google Analytics, here are the month’s most popular search keywords:

  Keywords Visits
1 solaris ending 13
2 solaris movie plot 11
3 solaris explained 11
4 solaris explanation 7
5 christian sauve 7
6 christian sauvé 6
7 glenn kleier 5
8 solaris movie ending 4
9 solaris 2002 plot 4
10 solaris movie explained 4

So… do you think SOLARIS was shown at least once on TV this month?

 

Other odd, special or amusing search keywords:

  • is "who am i" the most asked question on web
  • what does a christian man with a computer science degree do?
  • what was the point of the movie solaris

 

Until next time, my name is Christian Sauvé and I remain… obsessed by web statistics.