Matthew Perry

  • Numb (2007)

    (In French, On Cable TV, July 2022) Is it possible to have too good a cast? Maybe, when it creates expectations that the rest of the film can’t match. So it is that Numb, at first glance, offers an intriguing list of names: Matthew Perry, Kevin Pollak and Mary Steenburgen—not a bad cast for a comedy dealing with serious themes. In this case, we have Perry playing a Hollywood screenwriter who comes to experience depersonalization disorder. What begins as an intriguing premise, however, soon turns into something far more familiar—a low-octane dramedy in which a middle-aged man (well, nearly middle-aged: Perry was around 37 when the film was shot) finds solace in going out with a girl nearly a decade younger than he is. Yes, I’m being a bit too dismissive—but Numb does itself no favours by going back to some very familiar plot beats and mishandling some less obvious ones. The numbness of the main character doesn’t really resurface past the halfway mark of the film, and you could replace it with a generalized ennui without changing much of it. The film does have one high point, and it works to the rest of the film’s disadvantage in offering a glimpse at what a better, more coherent film could have been: Steenburgen shows up as an older therapist who ends up developing unprofessional feelings for her patient—another bit of male fantasy, sure, but one that’s handled at such a higher (welcome) pitch of comedy that it ends up making the rest of the film feel much blander in comparison. In the end, it’s hard to avoid feeling that Numb (even allowing for the fifteen years since its release) is taking us to overexposed territories—oh, no, poor aging white guys in Hollywood, shoving their midlife crises down our throats as if it was the most interesting thing in the world. (Spoiler alert: I am a middle-aged white guy; I had a midlife crisis; it wasn’t interesting at all. )  If Numb leaves you unengaged, let me reassure you: it’s not because you’re dissociating, it’s because the film is honestly just dull.

  • Fools Rush In (1997)

    Fools Rush In (1997)

    (On TV, March 2016) One of the underrated aspects of movie watching as a hobby is the time-travelling (or perhaps more accurately time-fixing) aspect of seeing actors at variable times throughout lengthy careers. The case in point here is Salma Hayek, a remarkably beautiful woman at any age, as proven by films such as 1997’s Fools Rush In. She’s the best and most distinctive thing about this relatively humdrum romantic comedy. Matthew Perry (also looking incredibly young) also stars in this tale of cross-cultural love set in Mexico and Las Vegas. It’s not much of a film at the story level: much of the plot is intensely familiar when it doesn’t suffer from severe tone problems. (I’m surprised to have to repeat this, but: Abortion plot points don’t belong in romantic comedies. Never ever.) Hayek, on the other hand, gives a spirited performance as a Mexican signer trying to find success north of the border, only to find herself inextricably linked to an American man after an impulsive fling. Fools Rush In does have its share of issues over tone: the premise doesn’t lend itself to consequence-free laughter, and elements of the third act get dark, clashing with the somewhat more ridiculous elements of the plotting. It’s not, in other words, much of a success. But as an opportunity to see younger Hayek and Perry riff off each other, it’s worth a look for fans of those actors.