Moustapha Akkad

The Message (1976)

The Message (1976)

(archive.org streaming, December 2019) Some movies are not simply movies—events get attached to them whether the filmmakers want it or not. You can watch The Message as a film about early Islamic history, designed as an old-fashioned epic not too dissimilar to westerns or Hollywood-on-the-Tiber biblical epics. It has vast battle sequences and stilted dramatic scenes, but it scrupulously avoids any on-screen depiction of Muhammad and some other central figures. The desert clearly takes centre stage as a backdrop. The result can be interesting when there is some action, dull when there isn’t, and familiar like many epic films are. As a movie, it’s a mixed bag. But then you start looking into the film’s production and release, and that’s when things take a turn for the fascinating. The film was led by a director, Moustapha Akkad, who wanted to popularize Mohammad’s life for western audiences, was financed by the governments of Morocco and Libya (i.e.: Muammar al-Gaddafi), was retitled at the very last minute due to a threatening phone call, and its American premiere contributed to a 1977 hostage-taking incident in Washington, DC, in which two were killed. Just to show you how weird history is, future infamous DC Mayor Marion Barry was wounded during the attack and one of the hostages was the father to David Simon, who would later go on to create The Wire. Amazing. Of course, we’re now so far away from The Message as to be trivial, but that’s the point: The film is far less interesting than the events that surrounded it. That happens.

Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)

Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)

(On TV, October 2019) It took no less than seven years for Moustapha Akkad, the producer of the Halloween series (at that point) to conclude the three-film arc launched with Halloween 4, but sixth entry Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers is a let-down even by the low standards of slasher films in following the fifth movie’s dangling plot threads. This being said, let’s be careful about expressions such as “three-film-arc,” and “following up on plot threads”: the production history of the series clearly shows that they had no idea where to go and made it up at each new film up to the shooting stage, which explains the disjointed plot details and increased supernatural mysticism of Myers’s powers. Whatever interesting plot elements are almost accidental, and they tend to be overwhelmed by the execution as, inevitably, slasher movies appeals to those who want to see “the kills” more than anything else. The production history of this entry is almost legendary for its chaotic nature, so all we’re left to contemplate is what shows up on-screen (and even then, there’s a producer’s cut also floating around—not what I’m reviewing here). And what shows up is … weird. Paul Rudd gets an early starring role, but his sullen creepy character is far away from his usual screen persona. This was veteran actor Donald Pleasance’s last film role, but even it was butchered considering that he died between principal photography and the extensive reshoots. The result is a mess, not even enjoyable by slasher standards. And if you’re not a slasher fan, then it quickly becomes exasperating. There are about half a dozen things and ideas in here that a more competent writer or director (or producer, considering the entire mess) could have used to make a more interesting film, but that’s not the case. There is an interesting historical context here in that the following year, Scream would re-examine the slasher genre and relaunch it on a foundation of self-awareness and snark, so you can consider Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers as the last dying gasp of the old-school slasher. As for me, this was the last reasonably popular Halloween film I hadn’t seen (or so say my notes, because these films are hard to tell apart without written documentation) and so I can walk away from the entire series with the conviction that off-brand Halloween III remains the craziest and best of them.